Page 181 - 1
P. 181

It is (not only) the will of god»: the king-doms of Cyprus and Cilician Armenia...  181


                    could not be made by other agents. This article has argued that the
                    general political situation in the East left rulers no alternative but to
                    form alliances, becoming closer to other local actors and taking sides.
                    The best possible allies for the two polities under study were the pa-
                    pacy and the Holy Roman Empire. The element of opportunism in this
                    choice is evident in the case of Leo, who also dealt with the Byzantines
                    and, as soon as he identified a better option in the form of the growing
                    power of the Mongols, became less concerned with the unification of
                    the churches. As for Aimery,  we cannot cite a change  of sides, but
                    when Aimery’s internal and external gains are examined in detail, it is
                    possible to assert that the establishment of the Latin Church and a
                    process of drawing closer to the pope and the Holy Roman Emperor
                    ensured Aimery’s position. Additionally, those who lost lands to the
                    Muslims in Syria and Palestine were granted lands and privileges in
                    Cyprus, where it was safer. However, this protection was a demotivat-
                    ing factor in recovering the Holy Land. Those whose assistance was
                    expected in  recovering  the  Holy Land  were  now  hesitant  to  resettle
                    there, where protecting their interests would require significant levels
                    of effort and resources. As a matter of fact, the Kingdom of Cyprus in
                    the twelfth and thirteenth centuries was relatively the safest region in
                    the wider area. It is therefore fitting to state that Cyprus was not es-
                    tablished as a Latin religious colony, but that its religious affiliation
                    usually served to underpin the kingdom's security.
                       The  wider  hypothesis,  of  ecclesiastical  actions  with  political  mo-
                    tives, gains strength from the fact that while the rulers of Cyprus and
                    Cilician  Armenia  benefited  from  political  manoeuvres  that  involved
                    spiritual  action,  the  papacy,  as  the  highest  authority  of  the  Latin
                    Church, reluctantly tolerated acts against Catholic teaching (such as
                    marriages  prohibited  by  consanguinity),  as  well  as  political  actions
                    against the interests of the papacy, so as to preserve close relations
                    between the Crusader kingdoms. It is thus possible to suggest that the
                    activities of the papacy, although spiritual in nature, had worldly po-
                    litical elements. In a broader context, it is also possible to assert that
                    the kingdoms of  Cyprus and Cilician Armenia survived longer than
                    other ephemeral Crusader polities, which may be considered a diplo-
                    matic achievement, while the success of the papacy was limited: pro-
                    motion of these kingdoms could make little difference in recovering the
                    Holy Land, and although the Latin Church of Cyprus survived until
                    the end of Latin rule, unification of the Latin and Armenian Churches
                    never reached the level that the papacy wished for and, indeed, even-
                    tually collapsed.
                       While the personal religiosity of Aimery and Leo II have not been
                    the subject of this article, and should not be underestimated, we have




                                                 Mediterranea - ricerche storiche - Anno XIX - Aprile 2022
                                                           ISSN 1824-3010 (stampa)  ISSN 1828-230X (online)
   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186