Page 176 - 1
P. 176

176                                                    Hakalmaz Turaç


                Church developed in ways that usually generated excuses for the Ar-
                menian clergy to refuse to attend ecclesiastical meetings like councils,
                while Leo sustained his relations with the papacy on the political level,
                namely in  cases of  defence,  political  disputes,  and  property issues,
                operating under the official declaration of unity.
                   The Armenians did not pursue connection with the Latin Church
                at the level of theological conformity with Rome. From the beginning
                of the thirteenth century, it can be seen that dogmatic differences be-
                tween the teachings of the two were not negotiated directly and alt-
                hough  some  new  practices  were  introduced,  others  remained  the
                same. It seems clear that the Armenians considered submission to be
                like homage, that is as an act intended to show respect to the succes-
                sor of the Apostle Peter, rather than as something requiring conformity
                in practice . In 1201, Catholicos Gregory VI wrote to the pope stating
                          97
                that the Armenian belief remained the same, as the terms of relations
                with the Latin Church were not conversion, and the two churches were
                united under the universal church . The Armenian Church was flex-
                                                  98
                ible  and  responded  positively  to  the  implementation  and  reform  of
                some liturgical rites, such as extreme unction, which was adapted in
                1243. However, Catholic positions on major issues such as the filioque
                and Petrine primacy were not taken up by the Armenian clergy and
                provoked  strong  negative  reactions,  especially  from  the  nobility  in
                Southern Caucasia .
                                   99
                   Armenian policies throughout the latter half of the thirteenth cen-
                tury are proof that claims of a church union and the correspondence
                and interactions around it were an outcome of the political interests
                of the Kingdom of Cilician Armenia 100 . After the disastrous Fifth Cru-
                sade, Armenians realized that western support might no longer be as
                fruitful as it had been at the end of the twelfth century. However, hear-
                ing that Emperor Frederick II was launching a new crusade, Armenian
                King Hethum I did move closer to the papacy and the Emperor. During
                his reign, Hethum granted more lands and privileges to the Teutonic
                Order, since he found himself once again reliant on Western aid  101 .
                Later in 1237, Hethum married Isabelle, queen regent of the Kingdom


                   97  Rhc Arm, vol. 1, pp. 422-423.
                   98  K.M. Setton, R.L. Wolff, H. Hazard, (eds.), The Later Crusades: 1189-1311 cit., pp.
                647-8; B. Hamilton, The Armenian Church and the Papacy cit., p. 74.
                   99  P. Cowe, The Armenians in the Era of the Crusades cit., p. 418.
                   100  Rhc Arm, vol. 1, p. 648.
                   101  B. Hamilton, The Armenian Church and the Papacy cit., p. 78. For the grants to
                the Teutonic Order see E. Strehlke, Tabulae Ordinis Theutonici cit., pp., 65-66, n. 83.
                For the correspondence regarding Armenian approaches to the pope, which Sempad the
                Constable regarded as diplomatic, see Rhc Arm, vol. 1, p. 648.



                Mediterranea - ricerche storiche - Anno XIX - Aprile 2022
                ISSN 1824-3010 (stampa)  ISSN 1828-230X (online)
   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181