Page 22 - 1
P. 22

548                                                       David Laven


                thus justifying the faithless conduct of Napoleon in subverting it,
                and delivering it over to Austria» . Daru had apparently written his
                                                18
                Histoire to legitimate the destruction of Venetian independence by
                the man he had served .
                                       19
                   What I write here is a mea culpa in which I question my own lazy
                suggestions about Daru and certain other francophone historians. I
                want to analyse what historians in the aftermath of 1797 actually said
                about the supposed decline and fall of Venice in its last century or so
                of  independence.  I  want  to  stress  that  among  both  Venetian  and
                French historians there was a surprisingly wide recognition that Ven-
                ice retained economic and administrative dynamism, and that it was
                not  without  military  capacity  or  Mediterranean  significance.  At  the
                same time, I want to show that much of the declinism – still evident in
                modern historiography – can be traced to Venetian historians them-
                selves. If French writers pointed to Venetian decadence, then they did
                little more than echo Venetian historiography. This was not a strategy
                to  deprecate  Venetians  and  excuse  Bonaparte;  it  emerged  from  a
                sometimes self-lacerating Venetian perspective that helped the nobles,
                citizens, and subjects of the former Republic come to terms with the
                end of the independence.


                3. Venetian historians and the decline and the fall of Venice

                   The collapse of the Venetian Republic came as a shock. Venetian
                historians  responded  quickly,  celebrating  the  longevity  of  their  lost
                ‘nazione’ and mourning its fall. In this they benefitted from the rela-
                tively  benign  rule  established  in  January  1798  under  the  Austrian
                prima dominazione,  which  initially sought to accommodate  Venice’s
                patrician élites . Venetians, such as Cristoforo Tentori and Carlo An-
                              20
                tonio  Marin,  who  wrote  on  the  extinguished  Republic,  drew  on  a
                longstanding  tradition  of  apologetic  Venetian  histories.  Works  pub-
                lished in the decades after the fall of Venice continued to depend heav-
                ily on this older historiography. Indeed, it is worth emphasising a very
                simple point – often neglected by historians of historiography -, elo-
                quently made by William St Clair: books are not always read as soon




                   18  F. Palgrave (Cohen), Handbook for travllers in Italy, John Murray, London, 1842,
                p. xviii.
                   19  D. Laven, Lord Byron, Count Daru, and anglophone myths of Venice cit.
                   20  M. Gottardi, L’Austria a Venezia. Società e istituzioni nella prima dominazione au-
                striaca, 1798-1806, Franco Angeli, Milan, 1992.



                Mediterranea – ricerche storiche – Anno XIX – Dicembre 2022
                ISSN 1824-3010 (stampa)  ISSN 1828-230X (online)
   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27