Page 124 - sfogliabile 49
P. 124

390                                                    Evrim Türkçelik


                It  gives  the  impression  that  Peçevî  retrospectively  attributes  the
                responsibility  of  the  conquest  of  Tunis  in  1534  to  Süleyman  and
                Barbarossa. Thus, the account of Peçevî was overlooked because he
                wrote his chronicle a century after the conquest of Tunis.
                   However, a similar version from the sixteenth century verified this.
                It is by Şaban Reis, a senior captain of Barbarossa’s fleet, who was
                captured by the Spanish captain Álvaro de Bazán in July 1534 near
                Oran,  the  main  Spanish  base  in  North  Africa.  Álvaro  de  Bazán
                interrogated the Ottoman captain in order to find out Barbarossa’s
                objectives,  and  according  to  his  report  to  the  emperor,  under
                interrogation Şaban Reis declared the following:

                   What [Barbarossa] discussed with his captains and with him was that they
                should head the coast of Calabria and that if there were anything (to be done)
                along the coast, they would do it; and that without losing time they would head
                straight to Tunis, to take that city and to use the place to store victuals so that
                they might (make) war against the Christians in the best manner possible 55 .

                   This  confession  indicates  that  the  conquest  of  Tunis  was
                Barbarossa’s objective from the outset, and in order to carry it out he
                did not want to lose much time attacking the Italian coast. Barbarossa
                had  evidently  shared  with  his  captains  his  plan  to  use  Tunis  as  a
                strategic base for future operations against the Christian states. The
                testimony  of  Şaban  Reis,  besides  flatly  contradicting  Barbarossa’s
                testimony in the Gazavât’s account, shows that Peçevî relies on firm
                historical  evidence  and  cannot  be  disregarded  or  dismissed  simply
                because his account was produced in the seventeenth century. Yet,
                the most interesting aspect of Peçevî’s narrative is that he brought up
                an important topic that most sixteenth-century Ottoman sources had
                suppressed: Barbarossa’s deception concerning Mulay Rashid.
                   Upon  his  arrival  at  Bizerta,  Barbarossa  spread  the  false  news
                among the Tunisians that Rashid, brother of Mulay Hassan, was in
                the fleet with him. This created excitement among the populace, as
                Rashid seems to have had considerable support in the city. After the
                city had been occupied, when the people wanted to see Rashid and he
                did not appear, the Tunisians understood that they had been deceived
                and  rebelled  against  Barbarossa.  This  was  an  integral  part  of  the





                   55  1534 Alvaro de Bazán Hace Preso a Xaban Arráez, Capitán de Barbarroja, en La Isla
                Alhabiba, Archivo de la Frontera, Alcalá de Henares, 2014, p. 9 (http://www.archivodelafron
                tera.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/1534-ALVARO-DE-BAZ%C3%81N-HACE-PRESO
                -A-XABAN-ARR%C3%81EZ-con-plantilla.pdf).



                Mediterranea - ricerche storiche - Anno XVII - Agosto 2020
                ISSN 1824-3010 (stampa)  ISSN 1828-230X (online)
   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129