Page 176 - mediterranea 45
P. 176

Cancila R (letture)_8  19/04/19  17:33  Pagina 173






                   Appealing to the enemy, breaking boundaries                     173


                   is more, disappeared, all the more so as the enemies of France and of
                   the Pope had great interest in discrediting the Pope’s image, already
                   quite compromised as it was by the unscrupulous nepotism that had
                   characterized his political actions. Examination of the letter books of the
                   Ottoman chancery now incline us to tend towards their authenticity. In
                   any  case,  among  the  incongruences  of  the  sources  and  possible
                   adaptations there must have been something authentic and something
                   to hide in those pages, all the more as the Pope did not make the effort
                   to declare them as false. Thus the consideration is absolutely credible
                   that  «between the totally genuine and the complete fake there is an
                   infinite range of gradual variations» (Ricci, p. 64).  And anyway – Ricci
                   notes – the Pope undoubtedly asked for help from the Sultan in the
                   attempt to block the conquest of Naples on the part of Charles VIII and
                   he became furious with the culprit of the ambush, excommunicating
                   him with the accusation of violation of Pontifical correspondence and
                   theft of money (the 40,000 ducats destined towards Cem’s maintenance).
                   On the other hand, the incredible escape between Ancona, Mantua and
                   Venice of the Sultan’s military messenger (Kasim) who had fallen into
                   Giovanni Della Rovere’s trap, «traces a geography of the philo-Turkish
                   positions existing on Italian soil at that moment» (p. 59).
                      In this scenario the position of the Gonzaga of Mantua deserves
                   some attention. Francesco II Gonzaga – great connoisseur of Turkish
                   horses, symbols of status and wealth, indispensible in war, «precious
                   economically and replete with symbolic value» (p. 91), probably at the
                   basis of the friendship between the Marquis and the Sultan – in 1510
                   was prisoner of the Venetians. It is certainly significant that his wife,
                   Isabella d’Este even made appeal to the Sanjak of Bosnia to obtain his
                   freedom so that Venice would intercede in his favour: Ricci considers
                   that the person was in effect «a reliable intermediary between two
                   friends (or two non-enemies) of the Turks, Mantua and Venice, who are
                   momentarily at odds with each other» (p. 94). The fact remains that
                   Gonzaga was freed  and certainly not thanks to the King of France or
                   the Pope, his powerful allies.
                      The agreement between Frederick II Gonzaga and Suleiman the
                   Magnificent a few years later appears to be more disturbing in an era
                   in which, between 1526 and 1529, or rather between Mohács and the
                   siege  of  Vienna,  Europe  was  being  heavily  threatened  by  Ottoman
                   armies on the Hungarian front. Italy was there, almost within their
                   reach,  and  the  position  occupied  by  Mantua  was  undoubtedly
                   strategic. It was precisely in these circumstances that the Gonzaga’s
                   betrayals  against  their  allies  occurred,  but  there  was  also  an
                   ambiguous correspondence between him and the Sultan, filled with
                   heavy  expressions,  of  things  said  and  not  said,  virtually  a  coded
                   language, that was comprehensible only to those in the know and able


                   n.45                           Mediterranea - ricerche storiche - Anno XVI - Aprile 2019
                                                           ISSN 1824-3010 (stampa)  ISSN 1828-230X (online)
   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181