Page 112 - 1
P. 112

638                                                     Magnus Ressel


                5. Conclusion

                   Was the traffic between Venice and Germany in the 18  century
                                                                          th
                still “somewhat the backbone” of the Republic of St. Mark? At least
                this can be stated with some certainty: traffic between Venice and Ger-
                many was at times, during this century, certainly contracting or at
                least stagnating, but over the long term, growth was the overall ten-
                dency. This certainly stabilised the economic fabric of the Republic. It
                is, of course, difficult to estimate even roughly what the impact on the
                other economic sectors of the Republic of Venice was. However, the
                indices we have at our disposal speak for an overall healthy situation
                in terms of traffic that was certainly in some way connected to the
                solid trade over the Alps.
                   In 1786 the Venetian fleet was superior in volume to that of Trieste,
                Livorno or Genoa; in the case of Livorno even very clearly superior. In
                addition,  the  Venetian  fleet  continued  to  grow  rapidly,  reaching  its
                largest volume in over 200 years in 1794, with almost 400 long-dis-
                tance merchant ships and a carrying capacity of almost 37,000 tons .
                                                                                  61
                Some historians speak even of a fleet that surpassed in the last decade
                of the Republic the number of 500 larger ships . The Trieste fleet,
                                                                62
                which also had a large tonnage, consisted mostly of small vessels un-
                suited to long-distance trade across the Adriatic. It seems to have been
                used to connect Venice and Trieste, i.e. the Balkan markets, with Italy
                and Central Europe via Venice. The Venetian fleet was not intensely
                active in the maritime trade towards Hamburg, but was concentrated
                on the Levant. Between Trieste and Hamburg, however, was strong
                maritime trade (on Danish and Dutch ships), which speaks somewhat
                for  the  weaker  transalpine  connections  of  this  port.  This  fact  also
                points towards an overall situation in which Venice and Trieste were
                less competitors, but far more served different functions within the
                markets  of  the  Adriatic  and  their  continental  hinterlands.  Such  a
                sharing of tasks may have been to the advantage of both principal
                cities of the Adriatic .
                                   63
                   The overall favorable picture that Georgelin has drawn from the Ve-
                netian trading situation in its last decades can thus be confirmed with
                a  look  at  the  trading  relations  between  Venice  and  Germany.  Most


                   61  U. Tucci, La marina mercantile veneziana nel Settecento, «Bollettino dell'Istituto di
                Storia della Società e dello Stato Veneziano», A. 2 (1960), pp. 155-200; J. Georgelin,
                Venise cit., p. 80-98.
                   62  A. Tamaro, Storia di Trieste, Vol. 2, Stock, Roma, 1924, pp. 192-193.
                   63  M. Ressel, Von reichsstädtischen Kommissionären zu europäischen Unternehmern.
                Die deutschen Händler in Venedig im 18. Jahrhundert, «Vierteljahrschrift für Sozial- und
                Wirtschaftsgeschichte», A. 107, n. 2 (2020), pp. 167-168.



                Mediterranea – ricerche storiche – Anno XIX – Dicembre 2022
                ISSN 1824-3010 (stampa)  ISSN 1828-230X (online)
   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117