Page 34 - 1
P. 34

560                                                       David Laven


                Eugène Beauharnais, Napoleon’s stepson and viceroy of the Regno
                d’Italia, he wrote his Histoire abrégée de la république de Venise .
                                                                                 67
                Labaume was a not unsympathetic historian of Venice, and clearly
                used  his  work  to  make  occasional,  far  from  oblique  criticisms  of
                aggressive  foreign  policies  and  imperialist  ambitions  –  Napoleon
                was the obvious target. Labaume saw Venice as a nation in its own
                right, albeit one that based its success on openness to immigration
                and an outward-looking mentality. In common with all the histori-
                ans I have mentioned, Labaume believed the twin threat of France
                and Austria central to Venice’s undoing. He identified the loss of
                Candia as pivotal to Venice’s decline, not because of the marginal-
                isation of Venice as an eastern Mediterranean presence or loss of
                trade, but because it led to a demilitarisation of Venetian policy and
                society: «Dès-lors on licencia les troupes, et l’amour de la paix et du
                commerce devint l’unique objet des vœux de la nation». This led to
                Venice’s drift towards neutrality .
                                                68
                   Defeat at the hands of the Turks encouraged doges not just to
                retrench finances but also «à faire goûter au peuple les douceurs de
                la paix», altering «le caractère de la nation» . Labaume almost im-
                                                            69
                mediately  contradicted  this  in  recounting  Morosini’s  successful
                campaigns,  and  the  victories  of  Alessandro  Molino  who  won
                «l’amour de la Nation, en triomphant des Turcs, et sur terre et sur
                mer» . But such victories were transitory. When in 1714 the Vene-
                    70
                tian ambassador was imprisoned in Istanbul, the Venetians had no
                choice but to appeal to the Holy Roman Emperor Charles VI to me-
                diate for them: «Son long assoupissement ne lui présageait que dé-
                faites: sans argent, sans soldats, elle ne savait comment soutenir
                la guerre» . The loss of Morea and the wider legacy of Passarowitz
                          71
                signalled a «paix humiliante»: Venice could no longer aspire to gran-
                deur,«et mit en plein jour sa faiblesse et son impuissance» . Hence-
                                                                          72
                forth, the smallest Turkish attack was

                [...] un sujet de crainte et de terreur; entouré d’ennemis puissans, qui tous
                lui faisaient la loi, il était obligé de tout endurrer sans se plaindre. Les uns
                violaient son territoire, d’autres luis ravissaient ses colonies; et cette an-
                tique souveraineté du golfe, jadis si respectée, et à laquelle Venise semblait



                   67  E. Labaume, Histoire abrégée de la république de Venise, 2 vols, Le Normant, Paris,
                1811.
                   68  E. Labaume, Histoire abrégée de la république de Venise cit., vol. ii, p. 405.
                   69  Ibidem, p. 406.
                   70  Ibidem, p. 415.
                   71  Ibidem, pp. 418-19.
                   72  Ibidem, p. 422.



                Mediterranea – ricerche storiche – Anno XIX – Dicembre 2022
                ISSN 1824-3010 (stampa)  ISSN 1828-230X (online)
   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39