Page 154 - sfogliabile 49
P. 154

420                                         María José Rodríguez-Salgado


                that  the  imperial  victory  of  1535  must  have  made  a  considerable
                impact, even if, as in the case of Kohler, the unsubstantiated claim
                that it had «a very positive effect» throughout Europe is accompanied
                by  a  warning  that  the  importance  of  the  campaign  should  not  be
                exaggerated. Similarly, Horn, after acknowledging that «the effect of
                the Tunis expedition on the political situation in the Mediterranean
                was slight and of short duration», argued that «most people must have
                thought of the expedition as a resounding victory» . It is a supposition,
                                                                9
                made all the more plausible as it was impolitic, if not impossible, given
                Christian ideology for other powers in Christendom to express hostility
                to a campaign against Muslim forces.
                   To  test  these  assumptions,  this  article  considers  the  information
                strategy adopted by Charles V and the response of Francis I and Henry
                VIII to the campaign. Both monarchs were at peace with the emperor but
                the French were hostile due to unresolved conflicts, especially over Milan,
                and the English afraid of imperial retaliation due to the king’s adoption
                of a Protestant faith and repudiation of his first wife, Katherine, who was
                the  emperor’s  aunt.  The  study  of  French  and  English  responses  is
                difficult  in  part  because  of  the  problems  reconstructing  an  accurate
                chronology  of  the  receipt  of  news  due  to  limited  data,  the  habit  of
                amassing information before accepting news, and the abundance of false
                news in circulation. Complications also arise due to the use of Tunis as
                short-hand for events in North Africa as well as for the state and the city;
                and of Barbarossa to refer indiscriminately to the man, to his Algerian
                forces, and to the Ottoman forces he now commanded . Moreover, we
                                                                    10
                are  dealing  with  consummate  practitioners  of  dissimulation.  Despite
                these  problems  the  research  reveals  a  great  deal  about  propaganda,
                international politics and diplomacy in the sixteenth century, and further
                erodes  the  myth  of  a  crusade,  contributing  to  the  creation  of  a  more
                balanced and nuanced picture of these events.


                The art of saying nothing: Charles V’s official declarations before
                the campaign.

                   After the Ottoman-corsair conquest of Tunis in 1534 the emperor
                appealed  for  aid  from  fellow  Christian  princes  for  a  campaign  to
                dislodge them, on the grounds that it was a significant step towards


                   9  A. Kohler, Carlos V, 1500-1558, Marcial Pons, Madrid, 2000, p. 259. H.J. Horn,
                Vermeyen cit., II, p 113.
                   10  The original correspondence of several ambassadors who were in Tunis has not
                been found, including that of Claude Dodieu de Vély, the French ambassador, or his
                English counterpart, Richard Pate.



                Mediterranea - ricerche storiche - Anno XVII - Agosto 2020
                ISSN 1824-3010 (stampa)  ISSN 1828-230X (online)
   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159