Page 178 - sfogliabile 49
P. 178

444                                         María José Rodríguez-Salgado


                emperor’s victory, depriving him of opportunities to project his power
                and promote his military prowess. But by the same token they could
                not project a counter narrative. In any case, the unstable situation
                meant  that  it  suited  them  at  times  to  emphasise  the  emperor’s
                strengths, and at others his weaknesses. Directly or indirectly, and
                sometimes unintentionally, both friends and enemies of the emperor
                contributed to the creation of a vacuum in 1535 with regards to the
                emperor’s  victory  that  facilitated  the  manufacture  a  heroic,  mostly
                unrealistic image of the campaign in the 1550s and beyond.
                   Even without the enduring attraction of the iconic art that resulted
                from Habsburg patronage, the Tunis campaign of 1535 might have
                secured an enduring place in the history of Europe later, because it
                provided one of the few notable victories in the centuries-long struggle
                with Islam. The propaganda was consonant with the distinctive and
                exclusive Christian European identity which triumphed. The reality
                was far from heroic or clear-cut and it was certainly not a clash of
                faiths or cultures. While ideology mattered, and war against the infidel
                was still important morally and in propaganda, it was more an ideal
                than  a  reality 155 .  Nowadays,  the  Tunis  campaign  of  1535  with  its
                blatant  control  and  manipulation  of  news;  the  fabrication  of
                information; the dissemination of lies and false news; the competing
                egos and clash of ambitions; not to mention the naked pragmatism
                and cross-ideological compromises, can produce a degree of unease,
                perhaps because of its very topicality. But a case can surely be made
                that an account that seeks to approximate closer to the compromised
                and  brutal  reality  is  arguably  more  fascinating  than  the  fabricated
                version and heroic representation of the campaign that prevails.
















                   155  For example, in the case of France, G. Poumarède, Pour en finir avec la Croisade.
                Mythes et réalités de la lutte contre les Turcs aux XVIe et XVIIe siècles, Quadrige/Presses
                Universitaires de France, Paris, 2004 and C. Isom-Verhaaren, Allies with the Infidel cit.;
                For Charles V: M.J. Rodríguez-Salgado, La Cruzada sin cruzado. Carlos V y el Turco a
                principios del reinado, in G. Galasso, A. Musi (eds.), Carlo V, Napoli e il Mediterraneo,
                Società Napoletana di Storia Patria, Napoli, 2001, pp. 201-237; M.J. Rodríguez-Salgado
                ¿Carolus Africanus? cit.; M.J. Rodríguez-Salgado, A masterclass in Justification cit.



                Mediterranea - ricerche storiche - Anno XVII - Agosto 2020
                ISSN 1824-3010 (stampa)  ISSN 1828-230X (online)
   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183