Page 174 - sfogliabile 49
P. 174

440                                         María José Rodríguez-Salgado


                Barbarossa’s Revenge

                   A  greater  dent  in  the  emperor’s  reputation  was  made  by
                Barbarossa. His actions overshadowed and neutralised the impact of
                the emperor’s victory. «He has left in tatters, defeated ... he will have
                to look to his own defence rather than to attack and offend others» («Va
                desecho y roto ... antenderá antes a guardarse que a offender y hazer
                daño»).  With  these  confident  words  Charles  V  dismissed  the  threat
                from  Barbarossa  in  August  1535 126 .  The  dignitaries  who  met  the
                emperor in Sicily and Naples commented that he was only interested
                in  talking  «delle  cose  di  Tunisi,  delle  quali  ne  tien  memoria»  and
                basking in adulation, as Paolo Giovio commented 127 . However, outside
                the  imperial  court,  as  September  1535  drew  to  a  close  it  was
                yesterday’s news. «I do not write about the taking of Tunis, as the news
                is  known  to  all  the  world»,  wrote  Bernardino  Sandro  to  Thomas
                Starkey from Venice, writing instead of substantial Christian losses as
                a  result  of  Barbarossa’s  latest  depredations 128 .  Doria’s  failure  to
                intercept the Muslim forces was widely condemned  129 . Then came the
                shocking news of Barbarossa’s brutal sacking of Mahón in Menorca 130 .
                   On 1 September, Ottoman-Algerian forces with some 30 vessels and
                3,000 troops docked where Charles V had stopped on his way to Tunis.
                They took the port on 5 September, sacking it and leaving the following
                day  with  some  800  captives  and  ample  booty 131 .  Charles  V  was
                informed on 16 September. Within a few days the news reached Rome

                and  thence  to  France.  Some  accounts  put  Barbarossa’s  fleet  at  50
                ships; several stated that the captives and goods he had taken more
                than compensated for his losses in Tunis 132 . News of the raids of the
                Ottoman-corsair fleet all the way back to Istanbul also circulated and
                there  was  even  speculation  it  might  destroy  the  Spanish  galley
                squadron – which it narrowly missed  133 . Distortions soon appeared.


                   126  Cdcv, II, p. 443, Charles V to Lope de Soria, 16 August 1535.
                   127   P.  Giovio,  Lettere  Volgari  di  Mons.  Paolo  Giovio,  Appresso  G.B.  et  M.  Sessa,
                Venezia, 1560, Giovio to Carpi, Rome, 28 December 1535. Charles V spent much of his
                meeting with Pier Luigi Farnese talking of «la victoire de Thunis», Du Bellay, II, p. 160,
                Du Bellay and Denonville to Francis I, 27 November 1535.
                   128  LP, ix, n. 512, Sandro to Starkey, Venice, 1 October 1535.
                   129  V.-L. Bourrilly (ed.), Lettres écrites d’Italie par François de Rabelais (Décembre
                1535-Fébrier  1536),  Honoré  Champion,  Paris,  1910,  p.  49,  note  2,  citing  Jean  du
                Bellay’s letter to Francis I, 5 November 1535.
                   130  KFI, V, p. 260, Charles V to Ferdinand I, 13 June 1535.
                   131  The controversial accounts of treason in Ags, E, 468 ff. 85 and 86, s.d. [ca. 6-18
                September 1535] and in www.archivodelafrontera.com. My thanks to Miguel Deyá and
                Miguel Ángel de Bunes for information on the captives taken.
                   132  Du Bellay, p. 109, Du Bellay and Denonville to Francis I, 23 September 1535.
                   133  Charrière, I, p. 277, Lavaur to Jean du Bellay, Rome, 29 September 1535.



                Mediterranea - ricerche storiche - Anno XVII - Agosto 2020
                ISSN 1824-3010 (stampa)  ISSN 1828-230X (online)
   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179