Page 216 - Mediterranea-ricerche storiche, n. 48, aprile 2020flip
P. 216

216                                            Beatrice Zucca Micheletto


                allows  to  better  investigate  the  links  between  charity  institutions,
                guilds and economic privileges granted by the royal power.
                   Firstly,  of  course,  artisans  and  entrepreneurs  were  asked  to
                perform different kinds of tasks, depending on the trade and on the
                size of the manufacture they had to organize. Cornelio Wanderkrik, for
                example,  who  produced  woolens  in  one  of  the  Ospedale  di  Carità’s
                mills,  had  to  oversee  around  thirty  workers,  while  the  master  Gio
                Sebastiano Eula managed ‘just’ a workshop, but we know he had up
                to 7 apprentices from the Ospedale, in addition to other workers. The
                case of the already cited French Jean Boullement, on the other hand,
                reveals another pattern. Native to Normandy, Boullement signed an
                agreement with the Ospedale di Carità to establish a workshop for the
                production of laces. He was expected to live on the premises of the
                institution with his family and two female workers and was required
                to train 25 to 30 female inmates for four years. In exchange of this,
                the Ospedale, granted him the right to keep and sell the outcomes of
                their work; he also retained the right to reject unmotivated girls. Not
                only  the  entrepreneur,  but  all  his  family  –  i.e.  his  wife  and  two
                daughters  -  were  required  to  participate  and  perform  work  in  this
                business.
                   Entrepreneurs, merchants and artisans could take advantage of the
                labour force made available by charity institutions more broadly, that is,
                not only by establishing a factory or workshop on the premises of the
                institution.  In  December  1725,  for  example,  Claude  Robert  de
                Montincamp petitioned the king in order to set up a factory for processing
                hemp thread and cloths in the region of Nice. Apart from a range of fiscal,
                economic and symbolic privileges he was granted, he significantly asked
                for  the  permission  to  employ  the  labour  force  available  in  the  local
                workhouses. ‘Boys and girls able to work’ were therefore encouraged (or
                forced?) to work in his factory, together with other external workers, who,
                in turn, were entitled to receive help from these charity institutions in
                case of necessity. The petition did not say explicitly if these poor boys and
                girls would be paid regularly; we know only that they would receive food
                and other goods to sustain themselves .
                                                    46
                   Finally,  we  should  take  also  into  account  the  fact  that  these
                entrepreneurs and merchants were wealthy, and could easily afford
                to found and fund their own charity institutions: such was the case
                for Ludovico Assom. Ludovico was a well-to-do merchant, born in
                Villastellone (a town 15 kilometres off Turin). After a life spent in
                the  Piedmontese  city,  in  January  1774  he  founded  in  his  native


                   46  F. A. Duboin, Raccolta cit., tomo 16, vol. 18, libro 9, Memorial  à articles avec les
                réponses (…), pp. 800-804.



                Mediterranea - ricerche storiche - Anno XVII - Aprile 2020
                ISSN 1824-3010 (stampa)  ISSN 1828-230X (online)
   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221