Page 170 - sfogliabile 49
P. 170

436                                         María José Rodríguez-Salgado


                Reactions in the English Court

                   Henry  VIII  was  also  away  from  his  court  in  London  throughout
                these  crucial  months,  on  an  extended  hunting  excursion  in  the
                provinces  with  his  chief  ministers  and  courtiers.  The  ambassadors
                were ordered to remain behind in London. This facilitated even higher
                levels  of  secrecy  and  silence.  The  king’s  absence  has  been  usually
                attributed to a desire to distance himself from the outcry following the
                despoliation of the English church and the executions of Thomas More
                and John Fisher. The news of their death reached Rome at the same
                time  as  the  taking  of  Tunis,  causing  the  pope  great  distress,  and
                diverting  attention  from  the  emperor’s  success 103 .  In  England,  the
                court  was  more  concerned  about  the  meeting  between  Leonor  and
                Mary  of  Hungary  than  with  events  in  Tunis,  in  case  it  laid  the
                foundations of a Franco-imperial alliance 104 .
                   Trustworthy news from Tunis reached Henry VIII in early or mid-
                August. On 11 July Gregorio Casale sent him copies from Rome of the
                emperor’s letters to the pope dated 29 June and 2 July, as well as
                details  that  the  imperial  camp  was  short  of  provisions  and  would
                suffer  heavy  losses  from  disease  if  the  campaign  continued  into
                August as was likely 105 . It is possible they could have reached the king
                by  12  August,  when  a  full  report  from  the  ambassador  in  Tunis,
                Richard Pate, arrived 106 . Casale and others continued to send Henry
                VIII up-to-date news from Italy, including details of the conquest and
                sack of Tunis and Barbarossa’s escape 107 . There must have been other
                letters from Pate, but they have not been found and the king did not
                admit  to  having  them.  Additional  information  came  from  the  most
                varied sources, such as Joan Batcok, a resident in the empress’ court
                in Spain, who obtained copies of letters from Charles V to the viceroy
                of Navarre and sent them to her uncle, John Batcok, who forwarded
                them (and the copy of a letter from the bishop of Palencia) to Cromwell
                on 5 August, along with details he had gleaned from talking to men
                already  back  from  the  North  African  war.  These  alleged  that


                   103  Ang, Carpi, 58, Ricalcato to Carpi, 3 August 1535.
                   104  LP, viii, n. 189, Chapuys to Charles V, 3 August 1535; and n. 190, to Granvelle,
                same date; n. 193, to Charles V, 10 August 1535.
                   105  LP, viii, n. 1053, Gregorio Casale to Cromwell, Rome, 16 July 1535.
                   106  Chapuys found out later, LP, ix, n. 178, to Charles V, 25 August 1535; the fate
                of Pate’s dispatch reported by Carpi, Ang, Carpi, p. 60.
                   107  Some of his letters have been cited already, see also LP Henry VIII, viii, n. 1120,
                s.d. Certayne newes of themperor, and n. 1144, News from Rome 28 July, Bologna 30
                July,  Tunis,  6  July,  and  undated  from  Naples;  LP  ix,  n.  127,  Bernardino  Sandro  to
                Thomas Starkey, 19 August 1535. LP, viii, n. 1155, Sir Clement West [to Cromwell], 31
                July 1535.



                Mediterranea - ricerche storiche - Anno XVII - Agosto 2020
                ISSN 1824-3010 (stampa)  ISSN 1828-230X (online)
   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175