Page 100 - 1
P. 100

550                                              Mahmut Halef Cevrioğlu


                of the latest military technology that had formerly been established
                through direct appropriations from lands incorporated into the Otto-
                man Empire  100 .
                   Speaking  of  technology,  the  notoriety  of  the  Kassandra  incident
                must have set an example for the upcoming generations of Ottoman
                mariners since the imperial navy adhered to galleys at least until the
                end of the seventeenth century. After all, as confirmed by Parker, the
                summer calm of the Mediterranean did indeed render the galley a bet-
                ter option for naval combats, at least, before the eighteenth century 101 .
                And related to the decline debate, this study largely confirms Jonathan
                Grant’s conviction regarding the absence of an Ottoman naval decline
                after 1571 102 . The Ottoman navy’s preparation for the 1633 campaign
                and even the Kassandra debacle underline the efficacy of the Ottoman
                maritime establishments after 1571 in two respects. Firstly, in terms
                of technology transfer, the Ottomans were keeping themselves on par
                with  Western  European  weaponry  on  their  fighting  vessels,  a  point
                highlighted by the employment of de Ábalos in the imperial shipyard.
                And as for the second, that is, for their adherence to galleys instead of
                sailing ships, the failure of the two English merchantman ships to es-
                cape the approaching Ottoman galleys mostly because of the weather
                justifies the Ottoman tardiness to adopt galleon.
                   One  thing  that  goes  unanswered  within  the  framework  of  this
                study, nonetheless, is why the Ottomans allowed favouritism to be-
                come a determinant factor in filling such important a post as the grand
                admiralty. But it is the question of a different and much more exacting
                endeavour. This one, to say the least, has tried to set itself apart as
                one other case study that pronounces the contrasts between the galley
                and galleon on the one hand, and those between the actual sailors and
                palace appointees on the other.















                   100  G. Ágoston, Merces Prohibitae: The Anglo-Ottoman Trade in War Materials
                and  the  Dependence  Theory,  «Oriente  Moderno,  Nuova  serie»,  Anno  20,  81  (1),
                (2001 - The Ottomans and the Sea), pp. 177-192, on pages 187-188.
                   101  G. Parker, The Military Revolution. Military Innovation and the Rise of the
                West, 1500-1800, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996, p. 87.
                   102  J. Grant, Rethinking the Ottoman “Decline”.



                Mediterranea - ricerche storiche - Anno XX - Dicembre 2023
                ISSN 1824-3010 (stampa)  ISSN 1828-230X (online)
   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105